Oops, you forgot something.
The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.
Amy says...I don't know if he's guilty or not, but he's had previous convictions of beating and strangling his wife, he deserves punishment.
Aside from that, he didn't even give evidence in his re-trial. Is he for real?!?! He's making an appeal to say he didn't do it and he wont speak for himself to stand up for this? Watched the television programme on his court case and he didn't seem bothered one little bit.
However, i do completely understand that there does not seem to be enough evidence to convict for murder at least.
Hope Justice is done one way or another.
radu says...I watched the case too. I am not saying he is not guilty (i think he did it), but there was not enough evidence for that. anyway, he deserves to stay in prison just for the fact that he tried to strangle her 5 weeks before the day she went missing. How would you feel about your husband or boyfriend trying to strangle you till your eyes turn red and your face blue?
you just saw 2 hours of a 7 week trial, so how much do u think you know about it?
Lucie says...How can he imprisoned without HARD evidence? After watching the The Murder Trial last night i have lost faith in the judicial system completely. Surely the verdict should have returned as unproven due to the fact that no body can prove any guilt!? And many will say he showed no emotion in court - he didn't speak up for himself....well, why should he show emotion, he's been locked up, had his freedom taken away for something UNPROVEN, he didn't speak in his own trial - wise decision to make in my opinion - and why should he have to - innocent until PROVEN guilty! It is worrying how this has happened to Nat - can anybody be accused and charged without evidence for murder then, can we just accuse people for crimes now on a hunch and have them locked up? The system is disheartening.